Berkley Risk reviews whether your PV asset, machinery breakdown, business interruption and insurer warranty-file requirements are properly addressed for your commercial site.
Many South African businesses have installed rooftop or ground-mounted solar PV systems, but the insurance programme is not always updated after installation. The asset may need to be declared separately, the BI basis may need to be reviewed, and insurers may require evidence such as CoC documents, maintenance records, surge protection, fire protection and security safeguards.
Home / Commercial Solar Insurance Review
Installed solar, but did your insurance programme change? Solar assets are not always automatically dealt with correctly under existing commercial policies. In many cases the asset is not shown on the schedule, the BI basis has not been revisited since the installation, and the evidence file insurers may request has not been assembled. This is the disclosure gap that is worth reviewing before a claim tests it.
Berkley Risk does not certify solar compliance and does not provide engineering or electrical opinions. This is not a residential product, it is not installation advice, it is not a CAR quotation for projects still under construction, and it is not a guaranteed offer of cover. Placement remains subject to underwriter appetite and insurer requirements.
Ready to review whether your commercial PV asset is properly addressed by your insurance programme? Complete the form and a Berkley Risk specialist will respond to arrange a review.
Commonly requested documents include the electrical Certificate of Compliance, SANS/SABS documentation, as-built asset schedule, maintenance contract, service records, surge/lightning protection evidence, fire protection and detection records, security safeguards, ownership documentation and claims history. Berkley Risk assists in organising this evidence file so it is available when insurers ask for it.
Sometimes, but not automatically in every case. A commercial PV installation may need to be disclosed, valued and shown correctly on the policy schedule. Insurers may also require evidence such as an electrical CoC, compliant installation, maintenance records, surge protection and fire/security safeguards.
A material commercial PV installation may require separate or specifically structured cover for property damage, machinery breakdown and business interruption. The correct structure depends on ownership, installation type, asset value, insurer appetite and existing policy wording.
Commonly requested documents include the electrical Certificate of Compliance, as-built asset schedule, maintenance contract, service records, surge/lightning protection evidence, fire protection details, security safeguards, ownership documents and claims history.
They can. If a PV system was not disclosed, incorrectly installed, poorly maintained or missing required evidence, insurers may ask questions at claim stage. The issue is not only whether solar is installed, but whether the policy and evidence file match the installed risk.
Business interruption cover depends on the policy structure and the cause of loss. If a business relies on PV generation, the BI basis should be reviewed alongside property damage and machinery breakdown cover.
It depends on who owns the PV plant, who benefits from it, who is responsible under the lease or finance agreement, and who has an insurable interest. This should be checked before cover is placed.
No. Berkley Risk does not certify engineering or electrical compliance. Berkley Risk reviews the insurance implications and helps organise the evidence insurers may require.
Berkley Risk (Pty) Limited (Registration Number 2017/412000/07)
Authorised Financial Services Provider under the Financial Advisory and Intermediary Services Act No 37 of 2002 – FSP#54407