Whether you’re facing challenges or looking for tailored solutions, our team is here to help. Get in touch with us today and take the next step towards securing your business’s future.
Last November, I got a call from a project manager in Midrand at 07:13 on a Saturday morning.
The voice on the other end sounded like someone who hadn’t slept.
“We had a massive storm overnight. Hail the size of golf balls. Scaffolding down. Site flooded. Parts of the slab exposed. The crane’s taken a knock. I don’t yet know how bad it is.”
By 10:00, he had video footage: water pouring through a partially built high‑rise, plaster blown off, expensive plant half‑submerged, and partially completed structural work sitting completely unprotected. The kind of footage that makes an insurer nervous and a contractor sick.
He had Contractors All Risk (CAR) insurance. The policy was active. The premiums were paid. He thought he was covered.
The claim was not fully paid. After weeks of investigation, it was reduced by more than half because the loss adjuster found basic control failures: no documented temporary protection over vulnerable sections, inadequate site drainage, and no evidence of specific storm‑season preparation, despite clear wording about “reasonable precautions” during the November–March high‑risk season.
That turned a large claim into a multi‑million‑rand out‑of‑pocket loss that could have been prevented with relatively modest investment in temporary protection and a disciplined storm‑readiness regime.
Important: This scenario is a composite based on the types of storm‑loss claims we see on Gauteng construction sites. Details have been fictionalised for illustration and do not describe a specific Berkley Risk client or case.
If you’re managing a construction project anywhere in Gauteng, Johannesburg, Tshwane, Ekurhuleni, or the surrounding municipalities and you haven’t systematically prepared your sites for summer storms and hail, you’re gambling with your project’s financial viability.
Gauteng’s summer storm season doesn’t ease you in gently. It arrives quickly, hits hard, and repeats often. Severe thunderstorms, hailstorms, lightning, flash flooding, and wind that can destroy months of construction work are not outliers they’re a recurring seasonal reality.
The South African Weather Service and local climatology studies consistently show that:
October to March is the primary thunderstorm and heavy‑rain season for the Highveld, including Gauteng.
November through the early summer months tend to see some of the most intense convective activity and hail events in the province.
Gauteng is among the most hail‑prone regions in South Africa, with repeated reports of large hail capable of damaging roofs, vehicles, and exposed structures.
At the same time, construction remains a strategic but stressed sector in South Africa:
The construction sector contributed roughly R109.5 billion in annualised value to GDP in Q4 2023 – about 2.7% of national GDP – according to Statistics South Africa.
Around 1.2 million people are employed in construction, representing more than 7% of total employment, with a high employment multiplier effect through suppliers and related trades.
Industry research indicates that while the sector contracted in 2024 and remains under pressure in 2025, forecasts still point to average annual growth of around 3–4% from the mid‑2020s onward as infrastructure projects and private investment gradually recover.
Every major weather‑related loss on a Gauteng site doesn’t just hurt that contractor, it compounds stress in a sector already under pressure from interest rates, slow payment cycles, tight margins, and political risk.
The good news is that most storm‑related disputes we see on CAR, Plant and Liability claims come down to repeatable control failures. They are avoidable if you know what underwriters will look for and you treat documentation as seriously as you treat concrete strength tests and programme dates.
This article will walk you through:
What typically fails in Gauteng construction storm claims
How the construction mafia and civil unrest interact with CAR, Plant and Sasria
What Sasria actually covers (and what it doesn’t)
A practical November site readiness checklist
How to align your insurance programme so that it actually pays when you need it
What Typically Fails in Gauteng Construction Storm Claims
After reviewing enough large, complex, and denied construction claims across Gauteng, patterns emerge. The failure points are depressingly predictable – and entirely preventable – but they cost millions when ignored.
1. Inadequate Temporary Protection for Partially Completed Work
The scenario: You’re three months into a commercial building project in Sandton. The structure is up to third floor, the slab is in, some brickwork is progressing, and internal services are beginning on lower levels. The programme is tight, the client is restless, and everyone knows the November storms are coming. A severe storm hits overnight with large hail, strong wind, and driving rain.
By morning, there is extensive water ingress through incomplete roofing and façades, damage to ceilings and services, ruined stored materials, and compromised curing on some structural elements.
What the claim adjuster finds:
No temporary roofing or enclosure over vulnerable sections of the works.
No evidence of structured storm‑preparation procedures before the event (no documented toolbox talks, no storm watch, no checklists).
Materials stored directly under unprotected openings and in areas known to accumulate water.
Programme planning that left large areas exposed heading into the known November–March high‑risk season.
Claim outcome: Insurers often argue that a significant portion of the loss was preventable with basic site management and temporary protection. The result can be a 40–60% reduction in the claim for negligence or failure to take reasonable precautions.
What you needed:
Temporary sheeting or roofing over exposed sections and critical workfaces.
Drainage channels and protection around excavations and partially completed structures.
Elevated, covered storage for vulnerable materials.
A documented site inspection schedule showing specific storm‑season preparation (with photos, logs, and sign‑offs).
If you cannot show that you anticipated storms and took practical steps to mitigate damage, you will end up arguing with underwriters about causation and negligence instead of focusing on rebuilding.
2. Unsecured Plant and Equipment
The scenario: Your site has R8 million worth of plant on hire: excavators, dumpers, generators, compressors, and a tower crane. Thunderstorms are forecast, but the site is trying to squeeze in one more long pour. Overnight, severe winds and hail hit the area.
The next morning, you discover:
Smaller plant has been blown over or submerged in pooled water.
A mobile crane’s boom or jib has been left at the wrong angle for high winds.
Generators and electrical panels have been damaged by water ingress because they were not raised or properly protected.
Temporary fencing and signage have collapsed, causing secondary damage.
What the claim adjuster finds:
Manufacturer instructions and hire agreements clearly specify how plant must be secured and parked in adverse weather – and those instructions were not followed.
No formal storm‑preparation checklist for plant and cranes.
No evidence that weather warnings were monitored or acted upon.
In some cases, plant values and hire arrangements were not properly declared under the Plant policy.
Claim outcome: The insurer accepts that a storm occurred, but questions whether the damage resulted from the storm itself or from failure to secure plant correctly. Parts of the claim may be reduced or declined, especially where hire conditions were breached.
What you needed:
Written procedures for securing plant and cranes during high winds and storms.
Evidence that these procedures were communicated and followed (toolbox talks, pre‑storm checks).
Plant schedules and values kept current on the Plant insurance policy, not assumed to be covered under CAR.
Photographs or logs showing plant condition and positioning before and after major weather events.
3. Inadequate Site Drainage and Flood Management
Severe thunderstorms in Gauteng often come with intense, short‑duration rainfall. Climatology research for the north‑eastern interior of South Africa shows that daily totals above 50 mm are a practical threshold for defining “heavy” or “extreme” rainfall events – exactly the kind that can turn a poorly prepared site into an informal dam.
The scenario: A cloudburst dumps a huge volume of water on a high‑density site in Centurion. Within an hour, excavations are flooded, materials are floating, and water is encroaching onto partially completed slabs and basements.
What the claim adjuster finds:
Stockpiles and formwork stored in natural drainage paths or low‑lying areas.
No cut‑off drains or temporary channels diverting water away from works and excavations.
Silted‑up or blocked stormwater inlets on or adjacent to the site.
No documented temporary drainage plan.
Poor housekeeping – waste and off‑cuts clogging existing drains and channels.
Claim outcome: The insurer accepts that heavy rain occurred but argues that the severity of the loss was driven by predictable, controllable site factors. The more obvious and avoidable the issues (e.g. storing formwork in a clearly visible watercourse), the harsher the view on negligence and the greater the risk of partial settlement.
What you needed:
A simple but clear temporary drainage plan that identifies natural flow paths, low points, and diversion measures.
Regular inspections and cleaning of channels and inlets, with checklists and photos.
Rules about where materials and formwork may not be stored.
Post‑storm inspection routines documented with findings and remedial actions.
4. Temporary Electrical Supplies and Lightning
South Africa’s lightning‑related death rate is significantly higher than the global average, and Gauteng is one of the hot‑spot regions. On construction sites, lightning‑related claims commonly involve:
Damage to site cabins, distribution boards, and temporary electrical supplies.
Surge damage to sensitive equipment and plant control systems.
Physical injury to workers when basic lightning protocols are not followed.
What the claim adjuster looks at:
Compliance with SANS 10142 (The Wiring of Premises) for temporary electrical installations.
Whether temporary boards were properly earthed and protected against surges.
Whether lightning protection systems (where required) were designed and signed off by competent persons.
Whether the site had clear lightning safety procedures (e.g. stopping crane operations and work at height during storms).
Where there is no paperwork, no Certificates of Compliance, and no evidence that lightning risks were considered, insurers are far more likely to challenge causation and scope.
5. Sub‑Contractor Back‑to‑Back Liabilities: Why Your Main Contract Might Not Protect You
Gauteng sites typically involve multiple layers of responsibility:
Main contractor
Various sub‑contractors
Plant hire companies
Specialists (façade installers, crane suppliers, temporary works engineers)
When storms hit and something fails, liability allocation becomes messy very quickly.
Common problems:
The main contract is clear on responsibilities, but sub‑contracts are silent or inconsistent, especially around storm preparation, scaffolding, and temporary works.
CAR responds to direct physical damage to the contract works.
Plant insurance responds to damage to owned and hired‑in equipment.
Public Liability responds where third parties suffer injury or property damage.
PI responds where design or professional advice contributed to the loss.
If your contracts and insurance programme are not aligned, you’ll spend as much time arguing between parties as you will with the insurer.
Gauteng Construction Mafia: How Site Extortion Interacts with CAR, Plant and Sasria
Storms and hail are not your only November problem.
So‑called “construction mafia” groups have become a serious national risk. Research and government briefings since 2019 indicate that more than 180 infrastructure and construction projects worth in excess of R63 billion have faced extortion and intimidation from such groups across South Africa.
Law‑enforcement updates in 2023 and 2024 reported:
Hundreds of cases opened relating to extortion and intimidation on construction sites.
Hundreds of suspects arrested in coordinated operations.
Dozens of convictions, but a conviction rate still low relative to reported incidents.
From an insurance perspective, extortion and site invasions interact with your programme in three key ways:
CAR / Plant – Physical damage to works, theft of materials, and damage to plant or cranes during invasions, forced shutdowns, or sabotage.
Sasria – Riot, strike, and public disorder risks that fall under special risk cover and are excluded from standard policies unless Sasria is in place.
Liability – Injury or third‑party damage on or around the site during unrest events (for example, if protesting groups damage neighbouring property or injure third parties).
Critically:
Extortion payments themselves are not covered.
What can be covered is the physical damage and certain business interruption losses caused by insured perils under CAR, Plant, Liability and Sasria, depending on how your programme is structured.
Most contractors only understand how these pieces fit together after a serious event, not before.
Gauteng summer storms & hail: car, plant, and liability | november site readiness checklist 32
What Sasria Actually Covers (And What It Doesn’t)
Sasria SOC Ltd provides special risk insurance in South Africa for:
Riot, strike, public disorder, civil commotion
Certain politically motivated acts and terrorism
For construction, Sasria can attach to:
Contract Works (CW) – covering special risk damage to the works and materials on site.
Construction Plant – covering special risk damage to owned and hired‑in plant and equipment.
According to Sasria’s published rate schedules, recent annual base rates for Contract Works “On Works” sit at approximately 0.0113% of the sum insured, and for Construction Plant “On Value” at roughly 0.11%, subject to minimum premiums and underwriting considerations.
On a R150 million contract, that typically translates into tens to low hundreds of thousands of rand a year in Sasria premium, depending on structure, deductibles, and extensions – a relatively small spend compared to the potential loss if civil unrest shuts a Gauteng site and causes extensive damage.
However, it is critical to understand the limits of what Sasria does and does not do:
Sasria covers physical damage and defined financial losses caused by insured special risks (riot, strike, public disorder, etc.).
It does not cover pure delay, loss of profit beyond the scope of any business interruption extensions, or the cost of settling with extortion groups.
The Sasria coupon must be correctly issued on top of a valid underlying policy, and the sums insured must reflect the true contract value and plant exposure.
This is why your CAR, Plant, Liability and Sasria placement needs to be designed together, not purchased piecemeal.
November Site Readiness Checklist: Storms, Hail and Civil Unrest
Here is a practical checklist you can use each November for Gauteng sites. Treat it as a live document – print it for site meetings and attach completed copies to your CAR and Plant files.
1. Exposed Structural Work & Temporary Protection
Engineer‑signed temporary works designs on file (scaffolding, formwork, temporary roofs, signage, hoarding).
Designs explicitly consider wind loads, hail, and heavy rain, not just static loads.
As‑built inspections documented (with dates, sign‑offs and photos).
Clear responsibility matrix for who designs, signs off and inspects temporary works (main contractor vs sub‑contractor vs engineer).
Method statements incorporate procedures for securing temporary works before forecast storms.
Vulnerable openings, slab edges, and partially enclosed areas identified and prioritised for temporary protection.
Materials and finishes not stored directly beneath unprotected openings.
2. Site Drainage & Flood Management
Temporary drainage plan drawn and communicated to site supervision and foremen.
High‑risk flow paths identified and kept clear (no stockpiles or formwork in natural channels).
Culverts, channels and stormwater inlets inspected and cleaned regularly (recorded with dates and photos).
Bunding and spill‑containment in place for fuel and chemicals, with clear inspection responsibilities.
Post‑storm inspection checklist in use after major rainfall events (documented with findings and remedial actions).
Waste and debris removed frequently to prevent blocked drains and hazardous floating debris.
Excavations and basements protected with pumps, alarms, and safe discharge routes.
3. Plant, Cranes & Materials
Cranes and heavy plant secured according to manufacturer guidelines for high wind and storm conditions.
Documented procedures for luffing, slewing, or parking cranes in safe positions before storms.
Sensitive materials (finishes, electrical equipment, glazing, façade elements) stored under cover or protected with appropriate sheeting and spacing.
Hired‑in plant correctly noted on the Plant policy, with values kept up to date, not just assumed under CAR.
Daily or weekly plant inspection records retained and filed (including site photos where possible).
Procedures in place to move or secure smaller plant and tools before severe weather.
Fuel and chemical storage secured against both flooding and unrest.
4. Electrical & Lightning Protection
Temporary electrical installations compliant with SANS 10142 (Wiring of Premises), with CoCs on file.
Surge protection and earthing installed and tested where appropriate on distribution boards.
Lightning safety procedures communicated and enforced (work stoppage rules, safe shelters, restrictions on crane operation during storms).
Any lightning protection system designs (where required) documented and signed off by a competent person.
Incident logs maintained for previous lightning or surge events, including remedial actions.
Clear rules about the use of generators, extension leads, and temporary boards in wet conditions.
5. Documentation, Contracts & Sub‑Contractors
Storm, hail and lightning risks explicitly addressed in method statements and toolbox talks, not just treated as generic “force majeure”.
Sub‑contracts include back‑to‑back obligations for temporary works, storm preparation, and compliance with SANS standards.
Sub‑contractors required to carry Public Liability Insurance with adequate limits and to provide proof of cover.
Design‑responsible parties (engineers, façade installers, temporary works designers) carry Professional Indemnity Insurance with limits aligned to project size and risk.
Indemnity and liability provisions in main contract and sub‑contracts reviewed with your broker to ensure they align with your insurance policies.
Site security plan updated to reflect current local risk, including potential extortion or intimidation activity.
Protocols in place for dealing with unlawful site invasion (legal escalation, SAPS involvement, client notification).
Sasria coupons correctly issued for Contract Works and Construction Plant, with sums insured matching the CAR and Plant policies.
Any business interruption extensions or delay‑in‑start‑up covers reviewed for sufficiency and practical trigger conditions.
Incident log maintained for any unrest‑related events (threats, work stoppages, protests near site), with contemporaneous notes.
Contractors and key sub‑contractors understand what Sasria does and does not cover.
7. Claims Preparedness
All site inspections, method statements, designs and checklists filed in a way that can be accessed quickly in the event of a claim.
Key project personnel know who to call first (broker, insurer, engineer, legal) when a serious storm or unrest event occurs.
An internal “first 24 hours after an incident” procedure is documented, including preservation of evidence, site safety measures, and communication protocols.
A contact list is maintained for after‑hours incidents, including senior management, broker, and professional teams.
Regular claim‑simulation or tabletop exercises conducted with your broker and project team.
What Happens Next: Your Construction Insurance Review with Berkley Risk
The uncomfortable truth is this: you only find out how good your CAR, Plant, Liability and Sasria programme really is when a storm hits, a crane goes over, or a mob arrives at your gate.
At Berkley Risk, we arrange Construction & Engineering Insurance, Specialised Project Insurance, CAR, Plant, Sasria and liability programmes for major projects across Gauteng and the rest of South Africa. We’ve seen what goes wrong on storm‑hit sites, and we know what underwriters will demand at claim stage.
Our construction insurance review typically includes:
Policy & wording review – CAR, Plant, Liability, Sasria, PI, and any project‑specific or Specialised Project Insurance.
Site control assessment – storm readiness, temporary works documentation, drainage, electrical compliance, security and unrest exposure.
Contract alignment check – ensuring that your main contract, sub‑contracts and insurance are actually working together.
Gap analysis & remediation plan – prioritised actions before the next storm season or renewal.
If your project:
Is in Gauteng or another high‑risk summer‑storm province.
Has a contract value of R50 million or more.
Relies on heavy temporary works, cranes, or significant plant.
Is exposed to potential unrest or extortion pressure.
…then a pre‑season or pre‑renewal review is cheaper than a single contentious claim.
Gauteng’s summer storms and hail are not going away. Neither is the risk of unrest.
The question is not “Will something happen?” The question is “When it does, will your CAR, Plant, Liability and Sasria actually respond – and can you prove you did what you said you would do?”
Hello 👋 How can we assist you with your insurance needs today?
By opting in, you agree to receive messages from Berkley Risk regarding our specialised insurance services. We respect your privacy and will use your contact information solely for communication related to your inquiries and our services. You can opt out at any time. For more details, please review our Privacy Policy.
